In court today, defendant John Lam explained the limited extent to which he was involved in Xtron and Firna bond matters.
Sharon Tan
-
陈伟庆资深律师列出思创第二份债券认购协议发生前的事件时间表。
-
Senior counsel Kenneth Tan establishes a timeline of events leading to the second Xtron bond subscription agreement.
-
被告人林岭恒证实,教会董事会会员可清楚了解思创投资的全部细节,包括使用投资资助跨界计划。
-
14 July 2014 – Summary of Day 1
-
第一位被告人林岭恒今早出庭作证时,解释了这起案件的核心课题——跨界计划的属灵宗旨。
-
The first defendant, John Lam, took the stand this morning, explaining the spiritual purpose of Crossover Project, which is at the center of the trial.
-
The court calls the six accused to present their defense in the CHC case.
-
5 May 2014 – CHC “no case to answer” ruling.
-
检方对事情一概而论、无法提出有力证据,并且无视与其举证相冲突的事件时间表——这些就是辩方“无需答辩”的呈请论点。
Defendant John Lam testifies that provisions were made for church’s board members to have complete details about the Xtron investments, including using them to fund the Crossover Project.
