John Lam

CHC Trial: Defense Reminds Court Church Money Was Used For Church’s Purpose; Suggests Prosecution Has Not Satisfied Charges

辩方今日下午继续提出“无需答辩”之申请，并指出检方缺少委托与支配的因素，加上第一份情报报告（FIR）的疑团，以及检方证人无法指证思创债券有任何“虚假”成分。

The defense continued this afternoon to press for “no case to answer”, citing missing elements of entrustment and dominion, coupled with the mysteries surrounding the FIR and the inability of the prosecution’s witnesses to testify of the “sham” aspect of Xtron bonds.

8 April 2014 – Summary of Day 1 of CHC “no case to answer” submission.

The CHC trial continued with defense lawyers presenting oral submissions for “no case to answer”.

于检方诉讼的最后一日，辩方试图证实审计师对预付租金许可协议的账目及其他事宜知情，对此也完全满意。

法官同意对Baker Tilly办公室进行进一步搜证。

Judge gives go-ahead for further seizure of documents from Baker Tilly’s office.

证人冯爱芳证实，思创债券的金额用来资助跨界计划并不是问题；辩方质疑证人“蓝色文件夹”里可能缺少的一些文件，并要求过目2003年特别审计工作稿，却得知工作稿已被销毁。