City News
  • Church
    • Church & Missions
    • 中文报道
    • Harvest Magazine
    • 《丰收》纪念特刊
  • Features
  • Interviews
  • Culture
    • CityFamilies
    • Community
    • Eye On Society
    • Lifestyle
  • Perspective
  • Who We Are
  • Who We Are

City News

  • Church
    • Church & Missions
    • 中文报道
    • Harvest Magazine
    • 《丰收》纪念特刊
  • Features
  • Interviews
  • Culture
    • CityFamilies
    • Community
    • Eye On Society
    • Lifestyle
  • Perspective
  • Who We Are
CHC TrialChurch & Missions

CHC Trial: Defense Counsel Deciphers Prosecution’s Case

By The City News Team September 6, 2013September 18, 2013
By The City News Team September 6, 2013September 18, 2013

It was a lively morning in court today as senior counsels Kenneth Tan and N. Sreenivasan began cross-examination of Wahju Hanafi.

CHC Trial: Defense Counsel Deciphers Prosecution’s Case

CN PHOTO: Daniel Poh

After four days of hearing the Prosecution question its witness Wahju Hanafi, the defense team for the six accused finally began cross-examination this morning at the CHC trial.

Coming after deputy public prosecutor Tan Kiat Pheng’s somewhat confusing line of questioning earlier in the week, both senior counsel Kenneth Tan, acting for John Lam and senior counsel N. Sreenivasan for Tan Ye Peng were a breath of fresh air with their systematic and logical approach in their cross-examination.

Using transcript references, Kenneth Tan took Hanafi through a number of arguable points during the examination in chief.

The court heard that Hanafi, having been impacted by Sun Ho’s concert in Singapore in 2002, requested to the management board of CHC to allow him to refund his donations to the church so he could use it to sponsor the Crossover mission. Between the years of 2003 and 2007, Hanafi had shared numerous times during church service about how God had blessed him, turning him from someone who earned a monthly salary of $300 to a person of high net worth, who now used his financial success for God’s work.

Hanafi also established the nature of his cashflow issues and his relationship with Kong Hee and Tan Ye Peng. Hanafi explained that all the times he had brought his financial woes to Kong and Tan, he did so because they were his pastors and spiritual mentors. He also explained that mostly these concerns involved temporary cashflow issues, not his net worth.

Through the senior counsel’s questioning, it also became clear that Hanafi had answered erroneously a few times during the EIC. For example, he had named John Lam as one of the four who signed a personal guarantee in favor of him when the four had in fact been Kong, Tan, Chew Eng Han and Koh Siow Ngea. He had also mistakenly thought that Lam was the Chairman of the CHC management board all the years during the Crossover, when in fact, Lam was only the Chairman in 2011 after the investigations had begun.

Hanafi also admitted he did not know much about how CHC’s management made decisions. He said that, to his knowledge, Lam had not been involved in the budgeting and financing of the Crossover Project and that Lam’s involvement in the Crossover Project was as a church leader, supporting the church vision.

Hanafi also told the court that AMAC Capital Partners (Pte) Ltd, CHC’s investment management company essentially invested the church’s money in Xtron Productions Pte Ltd’s bonds to yield a higher interest.

The senior counsel also addressed the “secret letter” of assurance that constituted a return promise by the church that in the event the bonds were converted to shares, the church would sell back the shares to Firna at US$1. Hanafi stressed that he had not requested for this letter as he did not want the church to suffer any loss. Hanafi further revealed that had the church exercised this option, he would not have relied on this undertaking, and would have given the full sum due back to the church.

Prosecution’s “Three Scenarios” Of The Firna Bonds

Sreenivasan took the court through a simple yet thorough journey through the prosecution’s many points, distilling the issues with “yes” and “no” answers from Hanafi.

The senior counsel suggested to the court that the prosecution had presented three different scenarios in its EIC:

  1. That the CHC-Firna bond monies were used by Hanafi personally
  2. That Serina Wee was giving directions about the use of the monies
  3. That the monies came from Papua New Guinea

The senior counsel suggested a fourth scenario and asked Hanafi to confirm if he was correct.

Hanafi testified that Firna used the funds from its bond proceeds to repay a $7 million debt owed to Ultimate Assets, a British Virgin Island company owned by Hanafi and his wife. Hanafi gave evidence that he did not view these funds as misappropriated monies as UA, ie he, together with his wife, was the lender of the funds to Firna. These bonds had to be repaid with interest and he had put his personal wealth behind the bonds.

When Hanafi expended the sums from UA for the Crossover, he clarified that these funds belonged to him and his wife, and not Firna. He confirmed the bonds had been drafted by well-respected law firms, namely Drew and Napier and Rajah and Tann in Singapore, and ABNR in Jakarta. Hanafi said he had no reason to suspect there was anything illegal about the bond transactions. In fact, as the owner of Firna, he saw nothing dishonest in receiving the bond proceeds from CHC as well as the sums of $5.8 m and $5.6m from AMAC.

Sreenivasan also established that in April and May 2010 when Tan, Chew and Serina Wee needed to get funds back for the repayment of the advance rental, it was for the church’s acquisition of shares in Suntec Singapore.

Hanafi gave evidence that both the CHC-Firna and Xtron-Firna bonds had been paid back in full and with interest. He had kept his three promises to sponsor the Crossover, repay the CHC-Firna bonds and to repay the Xtron-Firna bonds.

The defense counsel will continue cross-examination of Hanafi on Monday.

中文报道 – CHC审讯:辩方律师解读检方诉讼观点
CHCCity Harvest ChurchFirnaKoh Siow NgeaSerina WeeTrialWahju HanafiXtron
0
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTelegram
The City News Team

Related Articles

THN Malaysia Conference: Flowing In The Same Spirit

May 19, 2023

Spiritual Disciplines Series: Fasting

May 18, 2023

Young Adults Retreat: Experiencing Koinonia

May 12, 2023

Looking Back On CHC At Hollywood Theatre: Singlehood...

May 6, 2023

Pastor Appreciation Month Finale: Celebrating Pastor Kong &...

October 27, 2022

CHC Turns 33: The Joys Of Working In...

May 12, 2022

Derek Dunn: Upholding Kingdom Culture On Both Sides...

March 10, 2022

The Person Of The Holy Spirit: Kong Hee

February 14, 2022

My Fellow Workers: Celebrating Deepavali Together

November 18, 2021

Married? Here’s How Having Marriage Mentors Can Help...

October 16, 2021

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Cookout with Pastor Yong

Chap Chye



Claypot Rice



Osmanthus Jelly



Hainanese Pork Chop

City News Weekly

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

© City News. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Notice | Terms