City Harvest Church and Xtron were “related” in their common vision and objective, but finance manager spells out that CHC did not control Xtron.
Author
The City News Team
The City News Team
-
检方试图证实思创在被告的掌控之下；陈绍云维持其说法，思创乃独立机构，并已委任董事自行做决定。
-
Prosecution sought to establish that Xtron was under the control of the accused; Sharon Tan maintained that Xtron was an independent entity with its own directors who made their own decisions.
-
检方再次尝试证实被告们企图误导审计师，但陈绍云维持其说法，审计师可取得思创与教会两方的帐目。
-
检方展开对财务经理陈绍云的盘问；他们首先检验CHC董事会会议记录中所记载的内容。
-
Prosecution started its cross-examination of finance manager Sharon Tan by examining what was recorded in the CHC board meeting minutes.
-
19 September 2014 – Summary of CHC hearing.
-
CHC TrialChurch & Missions
City Harvest Trial: Church Board “Highest Decision-making” Body In City Harvest Church
No church funds could have been invested except with the approval by the church board, the court heard from Chew Eng Han’s cross-examination of Sharon Tan.
-
周试图证实审计师对于预付租金许可协议的相关交易知情。
-
Chew sought to establish that auditors knew about the transactions surrounding the Advance Rental Licensing Agreement.
About The City News Team
Here are my most recent posts
CHC TrialChurch & Missions
City Harvest Trial: Auditors Fully Aware Of Both CHC And Xtron Accounts, Reiterates Finance Manager
Sharon Tan maintains her testimony that auditors had visibility of Xtron’s and the church’s books, as the prosecution attempts again to show that the defendants tried to mislead the auditors.
周英汉向陈绍云进行交叉质询时证实，若没有教会董事批准，就不可投资教会的任何资金。